Five Questions Wall Street Hopes You’ll Never Ask

Keith Fitz-Gerald Mar 18, 2016
5 

The Dow and the S&P 500 are up more than 4% in the past month and millions of investors are finally gathering up the confidence to tippy-toe back into the markets. But, problem is, they have no idea where to start.

Thankfully, you don’t have that problem – you’re here and that gives you a huge advantage.

Sometimes, though, that’s not enough.

Good counsel is absolutely vital when it comes to building Total Wealth.

But how do you find the right financial professional from amongst tens of thousands?

That’s what we’re going to talk about today.

Starting with me.

I say that because many times Wall Street simply cannot tell you what I can, nor can they offer the fiercely independent analysis I do. There are huge conflicts of interest that are well documented thanks to the Financial Crisis, and it’s not in Wall Street’s best interest to have you thinking independently.

And that’s your edge – you’ve made a conscious decision to line up with the biggest Unstoppable Trends of our time, to concentrate your money in the best companies and to keep risk to razor-thin levels.

Even so, there comes a time in every investor’s career when having the right advisor in your corner can mean the difference between huge profits and devastating losses. That’s because he or she will help you make decisions that are uniquely dependent on your personal situation. Examples include money moves needed to minimize taxes, leaving a legacy for your children and grandchildren or simply planning for life’s major events.

But finding the right advisor is tough. The Internet is filled with stories of predatory sales practices, manipulative management stories and just plain incompetence. Chances are good you know somebody who’s had a bad experience just like I do.

It doesn’t have to be that way, though. There are great advisors out there if you know how to find them and what questions to ask to make sure you’re on the right track.

Finding the right advisor – and by that I mean one who is aligned with your interests – comes down to five questions Wall Street hopes you’ll never ask.

1) Do My Investments Match My Risk Tolerance and Expectations?

No doubt this will cause pushback from more than a few financial professionals. But I don’t believe any investor needs to suffer the ravages of a bear market.

I don’t care if you have $5,000 or $500,000 to invest – the principles remain the same.

No financial advisor worth his or her salt would let a client liquidate into a bear market. Moreover, the good ones ensure that their clients have enough cash and ultra-safe investments on hand so they don’t have to.

If your advisor has you leveraged to the eyeballs, or fully invested in such a way that you can’t endure the bumpy trading we’ve got right now much less a protracted downturn, it’s time to find a new advisor.

I don’t care if it’s an up market or a down market, the best advisors will help you pick investments that match your goals within your financial time frame.

The problem faced by many investors today is that they’ve always thought in terms of returns rather than risks. That’s backwards, especially at a time when the riskiest investments – bonds, for example – were supposed to be the most secure.

This is compounded by the fact that many investors – having lost big twice in the last decade – remain underinvested and are faced with playing catch-up in a market that is arguably toppish right now. They never should have stepped off the court in the first place.

As you know from prior Total Wealth columns, it pays to stay the course no matter what the headlines.

In a study of 7.1 million retirement accounts, Fidelity discovered that those who sold their stock mutual funds between October 2008 and March 2009 (the period of greatest volatility we’ve seen yet), more than 50% had not reinvested as of June 30, 2011.

Those who stayed in the markets, and in stocks specifically, saw the value of their accounts rise 50% on average. Those who sat on the sidelines saw an average increase in their accounts of… wait for it… just 2%.

I’m sure those numbers haven’t changed very much even now.

2) How Do My Total Returns Stack Up?

Many investors are after the next hot stock or the next sure thing, and focus on the percentage returns of specific choices. Understandably, they love being up 25%, 50%, 100%, or more. I do, too.

Call me crazy, but I prefer not losing money in the first place.

That’s why I’d rather invest with the idea of managing my total returns than throwing darts at specific stocks that may hit… or miss. Over time, I know that greater returns are possible that way.

What people don’t realize is that successful investing is a matter of continuous performance. Not instantaneous performance. It’s one of the reasons I emphasize income and, in particular, the right dividend stocks as part of the Total Wealth approach.

For all the lip service people pay to this, very few realize that dividend and reinvestment can account for 85%-90% of total stock market returns over time.

In some cases, the dividends are so steady and increase so much that you can actually make more in dividends than you paid to buy the stocks that produce them initially.

The same is true with fixed income, where it’s the income that has made a graphic difference in total returns despite rates dropping to all-time lows and hovering there even today.

Ask anybody who’s invested in the PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE: RCS) over the past 20 years. RCS is actually trading at a price that’s approximately 10% less than it was 20 years ago – but investors who know how to harness the power of re-invested dividends had the chance to turn $10,000 into more than $64,000.

Figure 1: Source: www.dividendchannel.com
Click to View
Moreover, these savvy investors can look forward to a $7,680 income stream by year 20 thanks to the re-invested dividends – not bad for an initial $10,000 investment!

To be fair, people tell me that time is the one thing they don’t have, especially with the markets near all-time highs.

Respectfully, I disagree.

The markets are almost always at or near all-time highs. That’s how they work, considering they have a powerful upward trend over the long term.

To put this into perspective, consider this fact. Markets achieve new highs an average of once every 18 days, according to research by Ric Edelman, President of Edelman Financial. I know that sounds like a loaded statement and it is. But I told you this to make a point – even the lows of 2003 and 2008 were all-time highs compared to the markets in 1990.

What I want you to understand today is that, young or old, you want to learn to work with time, instead of trying to cheat it at every opportunity.

And the right advisor can help you do that effectively.

For instance, if you’re a few years into retirement, you probably want to consider having some bonds running around so that you can rebalance if and when the markets give you a chance and head south. If you’re concerned about leaving a legacy, perhaps a strategic move to preserve principle is more in order under the same market scenario.

A good advisor will listen carefully and help you plan accordingly.

3) Under What Conditions Will You Sell?

Many advisors actually have no idea on this one. Not only that, but they don’t want you to sell. It’s one of Wall Street’s dirty little secrets.

Think about it…

Selling is not in their best interest. Wall Street makes their money from your money. They want you in the game, so they will do everything they can to keep you playing.

This includes creating all kinds of fancy dashboards and gee-whiz programs as a means of drawing you in. You’ve seen the commercials. You know what I’m talking about.

At times, they’ll shift gears and highlight some sort of total care package as in “we care for your money.”

But trust me, benevolence is not in their vocabulary.

If your financial advisor can’t lay out very specific reasons for when and what you would sell, move on. Knowing when to cut losses – and explaining clearly when to do so – is the hallmark of a worthwhile financial advisor. This can be an elaborate plan, but also something as simple as a 25% trailing stop.

It really doesn’t matter, as long as they have a plan based on your specific needs and can clearly articulate it to you without any hemming and hawing when you ask.

4) When Will We Buy?

This is very closely related to “when do we sell.” And again, most advisors don’t have a clue. You’d think at least they would have this one covered, but most don’t.

And that’s unfortunate because there are two broad considerations to deal with here. And both of them have a direct impact on your money.

First, timing the market is a bad idea. According to Barron’s, 85% of all buy/sell decisions are incorrect. That’s because emotional bias drives bad decisions, particularly when it comes to attempts to time the markets.

As for how much this will cost you… try 268% over 20 years.

The latest DALBAR data shows that the return of an average investor trying to time the market is a pathetic 2.53% per year, versus the S&P 500 return of 9.02% over the same time period.

More than 90% of portfolio volatility comes from structure. Get that right, and chances are good that you’ll come out way ahead of the game, especially if you use something like our proprietary 50-40-10 portfolio.

Second, the markets have a decidedly upward bias over time. That means that outstanding performance is a matter of identifying relative weakness and wading into it, rather than running the other way.

For instance, take a look at this chart.



Click to View
It is simple.

Investors who buy into the markets without understanding the big picture get hammered trying to chase returns. Yet, investors who buy when things are gloomiest tend to build legendary wealth.

You can argue that you’ll never see this in your lifetime, but you’d be dead wrong. Most investors will see 2-5 specific periods in their investing lives where the relative valuations favor more buying than selling.

That’s why I’d fire any advisor who does not recommend cautious additions to your portfolio when everyone else is running for the hills. At the very least, they should ask you to consider rebalancing periodically to capitalize on prices that would otherwise not be so low.

5) Finally, How Are You Being Compensated?

I don’t believe in paying people for performance they don’t deliver.

I am not crazy about paying ginormous account management fees if I’m not getting good results. You shouldn’t be, either.

Over time, the typical 1%-2% management fees charged by many big investment houses and managers can really be a drag on performance that bleeds your retirement of much-needed momentum and future results.

I think fee-only advisors are a much better choice. They sit on your side of the table and have your vested interests in mind.

Further, because they are independent, they disclose all conflicts of interest in advance (or at least they should) and are not beholden to investment banking, ratings, or other nonsense that lurks unbeknownst to most investors. They don’t have a financial stake in your investments.

I think that’s especially important at the moment for one simple reason – many of the conflicts that are inherent in today’s investment world are directly the result of conflicted choices. They are presented under the guise of comprehensive planning by brokerage firms that would like you to believe they perform the same functions as investment advisors. They don’t.

What if you don’t work with an advisor right now? Hire one… and don’t delay.

I know that may seem expensive, but it’s a matter of perspective.

Putting $50,000 into a mutual fund charging a 3% load works out to 10 hours of professional, fee-only investment advisor’s time – and that’s at an hourly rate of $150!

Given the risks in today’s markets and the inherent problems with Wall Street – not the least of which are pronounced conflicts of interest – I think that is money well-spent.

Until next time,

Keith

5 Responses to Five Questions Wall Street Hopes You’ll Never Ask

  1. Steve says:

    Hi Keith,

    Thank you for your excellent article and stressing the huge dividend compounding effect. RCS looks really attractive to me. I have only one concern and want to hear your opinion on this — If Fed gradually increases interest rate, do you think it would cause any negative impact on RCS ?

    Thanks,
    Steve

  2. H. Craig Bradley says:

    Alibaba around the time of its IPO in Sept-Oct of 2014 was a good example of a Emotional BUY/sell transaction. As such, it was doomed in the intermediate term, at least. Market price in Sept. 2014 was around $90.00/share. Why? Market Euphoria. Because the Market and investor sentiment was near its all time HIGH ( again ) and has not exactly fully recovered since then ( 85% on individual investors can not successfully time the highs or lows in the market ).

    Chinese devaluation of their Renumbi in August 2015 had little to do with the performance of Alibaba since IPO because of the euphoria and overly high prices (optimism) surrounding the initial IPO. BABA was both overrated by its supporters and oversubscribed compared to its actual value. At current prices ( $76.00/share), its a relatively good value and long term buy ( but still risky). In this stock market, foreign stocks , especially those from communist countries, have been discounted, perhaps reflecting a nativist attitude and current social-political trends ( Trump Phenomenon) .

    As it turned out, buying BABA in Sept or Nov. 2014 was simply following the herd. The me-too syndrome. The results so far suggest it was just not the best time to buy-in. Nobody could resist going along. In defense, it is difficult to avoid because of unconscious group behavior of investors to act and do the same at any given moment. www. elliotwave.com has lots of data about sociomics to demonstrate patterns of investor herd behavior.

    Emotions and sentiment often overrule objective common sense (fundamentals), even with financial advisors. The result is everybody gets sucked-in and pays a premium as a result. Its hard to say no when everyone is saying and feeling yes. Veritably impossible in practice. You buy (lock-in) your gain by the price you pay. If you overpay with everyone else, you have to wait a long time to be in the money or sell when your stop-loss market order is triggered. Cutting your loss means you were wrong and paid too much, even for a quality stock. Its puzzling, to say the least.

    Without even consciously knowing it, many professionals strongly recommended buying into the China Story and by association: Alibaba. Problem is, momentum (U.S.) stocks such as the “FANGS” have outperformed most other NASDAQ stocks in recent years ( since BABA IPO). Chinese and other foreign stocks were left behind on account of FX market shifts ( a resurgent U.S. Dollar) since 2014. So, BABA was simply in the wrong sector at the time to show superior total returns. This certainly illustrates the risks in any one (large) bet: you can be quite wrong.

    • Keith says:

      Hello Steven and thanks for the kind words; it was fun to write.

      Your question is a good one. No doubt that RCS will come under pressure as rates rise but the shorter duration will help shield that. The more immediate question, is what negative rates will mean for RCS and I think there the answer is a rally. Most investors, of course, will miss it which will be too bad because the establishment is lining up behind the concept.

      Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

    • Keith says:

      Hello Craig.

      Some really terrific thinking here all of which ultimately boils down to something we talk about frequently – you never bet the farm on any single holding. Alibaba as part of a disciplined portfolio like those we advocate is a terrific idea but Alibaba in isolation is a terrible bet to make.

      Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

  3. john arnett says:

    I think if investing have your own trade account if possible JOHN ARNETT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *