What Really Went on in Mar-a-Lago… And How to Profit from It

Keith Fitz-Gerald Apr 12, 2017

Dear Reader,

“…but Trump hates China??!!”

That was my friend Jack, who couldn’t fathom that last week’s historic meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and United States President Donald J. Trump didn’t end in a diplomatic donnybrook.

Like many investors who expected the gloves to come off, he’s wondering what gives and what this means for his money.

I’ve got a few answers and I think you’re going to be very excited by what I have to say about where to position your money next, especially if you “missed” Amazon.

Here’s what you need to know.

President Trump was emphatic on the campaign trail when it came to China.

He would…

… label the country a currency manipulator on “Day One” in office
…end unfair trade that hurts American workers, and
…clamp down on Chinese espionage

Naturally, the mainstream media loved it.

Conflict boosts ratings and by all accounts they expected last week’s two-day summit at Mar-a-Lago to be filled with testy sound bites and lots of earnest hand wringing.

Instead what they got was a friendly meeting, lots of smiles, and a 100-day plan to work on key initiatives that draw the two nations closer… for reasons they can’t explain, which is why they’ve gone strangely silent on the matter.

As I’ve noted repeatedly over the past 12 months, the biting rhetoric on both sides leading up to the meeting was for domestic consumption. I counseled that, contrary to what you were hearing, it would get dialed back.

Think about this for a moment.

President Trump needed to appear tough on the campaign trail. Faced with a the prospect of a very different leader, President  Xi needed to appear to have Chinese interests and the Chinese people, in particular, at the top of his list. So both men talked tough to their respective audiences.

Now, that Trump’s in office, they need to work together for the simple reason that the United States needs China just as much as China needs the United States.

Busting the China Myth

If what I am saying makes you uncomfortable, I get it. This is a scary thought for a lot of people because China is an enigma. Very few Americans have travelled there despite the fact that the country “opened” more than 40 years ago.

That, in turn, means very few Americans understand who or, more precisely, what we’re dealing with. Making matter worse, an entire generation has been raised to believe that China’s the “enemy” when the average Chinese has no interest in playing that role.

Unbeknownst to most investors and voters alike is the reality is that the average American family saves $1,000 a year or more buying Chinese goods. At the same time, approximately 40% of the trade deficit President Trump rails on actually comes from American companies doing business there.

What’s more, China is no longer a currency manipulator hell bent on lowering the value of the yuan against the dollar contrary to what a lot of people want to believe and what policy wonks trying to protect vested interests want to spoon feed you.

In fact, China is actually spending huge amounts of foreign reserves to buy back the yuan and strengthen it. So much so that China now meets only 1 of 3 criteria established by the U.S. Treasury needed for a country to be officially labelled a currency manipulator. If you really want to take on currency manipulators, then you’ll need to make tracks for Japan, Switzerland, Korea, Taiwan, and Germany – all of which do meet 2 of the 3 needed conditions. But that doesn’t make for great headlines.

Today, China and the United States account for approximately 39% of the global economy, a figure that has swelled as we’ve integrated our economic development over time.

There is no exit for either nation.

Fearful investors tell me frequently that China could exercise the “nuclear option” and dump trillions in U.S. Treasuries on global markets. Whoever came up with that one clearly doesn’t understand how real trading works.

There isn’t another nation in the world that could absorb that kind of liquidity. China’s currency is closely tied to the dollar which means that dumping treasuries would devastate China’s economy.

If anything, China’s going to buy more.

Of everything.

China’s exports to the United States alone totaled $483 billion in 2015. That is more than four times the $116 billion in exports that the U.S. sent to China, its third-largest export market after Mexico and Canada.

Chinese and American companies have integrated over the last few decades to establish the most robust supply chains for all things, including iPhones, computers, airplanes, and more. To give you an idea, the U.S. imports more than $37 billion in just laptops alone from China. Stopping that flow would result not only in huge economic losses but also in social unrest – the one thing that Beijing absolutely does not want, and which it fears most.

Something else to consider is that the Chinese actually like the affluence that comes with wealth so they’ll do everything they can to ensure it continues. As we have discussed many times, luxury does not recognize national boundaries any more than the hope of a better future does.

By 2030, the U.S.-China Business Council expects U.S. exports to China exceed $520 billion, but I think the figure may be double that based on how consistently the West has underestimated Chinese growth.

We’ve Survived Tensions Before… We’ll Survive Them Again (and Prosper)

Keep this in mind.

Very few of the reporters who are spewing headlines around the Internet at the moment have spent time in China, let alone made the effort to really understand what makes its people think. Speaking on the sudden emergence of “China experts” a few years ago, legendary investor Jim Rogers observed that he found it “interesting that people who couldn’t spell China 10 years ago are now experts on China.”

I agreed at the time and still agree today. It’s entirely logical that they’ll fear China under the circumstances.

Yet, the China-U.S. economic relationship has survived Tiananmen Square, the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, the dot-com bubble, the 2009 financial crisis, and China’s massive losses in mortgage-backed securities. It will survive the “One China” policy and concerns over North Korea, too.

Which brings me to your money.

Like it or not, China will be the single most important economy of the 21st century. It’s not something you should walk away from but, rather, look to invest in or because of.

I can’t think of a better choice to get started if you haven’t already than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (NYSE:BABA), which dominates Chinese e-commerce there the way that Amazon.com Inc. (NasdaqGS:AMZN) does here.

Not many investors realize it but the Chinese e-commerce market is already the world’s largest online retail market with total sales that may hit $1 trillion this year, and $2.416 trillion by 2020, according to eMarketer. More than half of all sales, incidentally, are via mobile devices despite the fact that only 52% of the population is online.

The variables are familiar even if China itself is not.

The middle class of 700 million people is expanding, the Internet is being used to compensate for inefficient retailers, and infrastructure is getting better – which means better delivery.

To put this in perspective, Cainiao – Alibaba’s delivery and logistics division – owns 180,000 delivery stations and is rapidly expanding fresh food offerings. Bloomberg reported that Amazon only has 72 including fulfillment, sorting, and AmazonFresh hubs.

If you’ve ever tried to buy fresh anything in a third-tier Chinese city super market you’ll immediately recognize the significance at a time when there are 200 million Chinese who have yet to get online outside first tier urban areas.

According to Fortune, Alibaba hosts some 10 million merchants and that those same merchants account for 30 million jobs. The 1 million job figure that Chairman Jack Ma floated in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last year is chump change…and absolutely doable.

Like Amazon, Alibaba is working on advanced artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles and next generation technologies that will bolster China’s economy for decades to come. The company is moving beyond payment processing to loans in competition with China’s state owned banks.

Unlike Amazon, however, which considers growth at all costs first and profits second, Alibaba places an emphasis on making money. The company posted operating profits of $6.7 billion in 2016 versus Amazon’s $4.2 billion in the same time frame, for example.

Not surprisingly, other critical figures stack up favorably, too.

That makes the company very different from Team Bezos – and worth at least a portion of your investment money.

Like it or not.

In the meantime, here’s a shot of me in Shanghai after a great day vintage motorcycling in and around the city’s exceptionally well preserved Art Deco buildings… which is a story for another time and something you should see if you have the chance!

On Friday, we’re going to answer an important question I received last week from Margaret who’s 81 years young and wondering what to do next with an issue many investors would love to have.

Until then,


9 Responses to What Really Went on in Mar-a-Lago… And How to Profit from It

  1. Barry says:

    been following alibaba for awhile now thanks to your organization & booked some nice profits thank you

    Thanks you

    • Keith says:

      Thanks for the kind words, Barry!

      I’m thrilled that you’re following along and even more excited to hear that you’re making money doing so.

      Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

  2. Dick Klompe says:

    You mention Germany as a ‘Currency Manipulator’ which in effect means that all countries, which have the Euro as their currency, are currency manipulators, which of course is ridiculous… can you back this up? Perhaps it would be appropriate to correct/explain this matter in a future issue.

    • Keith says:

      Hello Dick and thanks for asking.

      Actually (and respectfully) the Euro may be one of the most manipulated currencies of all when you think about how the ECB works and the actions it’s undertaken since the Financial Crisis began.

      As for the criteria used to determine whether or not any specific nation is a currency manipulator, that’s set out by the Treasury Department in this report.

      To summarize, 1) a country must have a bilateral trade surplus with the US; 2) a country has a “material” currency account surplus; and 3) the country is engaged in persistent one-sided intervention in the foreign exchange market.

      Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

  3. jim says:

    I would like to see you expand your coverage of Chinese stocks , because this is where I believe the best growth will be coming from

    • Keith says:

      Hello Jim.

      I’d be happy to and will be doing so in the months ahead now that the 100 day plan is in play.

      Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

  4. Ikweek. says:

    Mr keith,
    I really excited with the way and manner you present issues on investments. Can you kindly provide some guidance on how to explore the opportunity avaliable in Chinese-American trades links for those of us that are fron Africa with no strong economic policy?

  5. Keith says:

    Dear Lkweek,

    Thank you for the kind words. I am thrilled you find my work helpful. I will do my best to make sure that we address the opportunities as you suggest.

    Best regards and thanks for being part of the Total Wealth Family, Keith 🙂

  6. Akin Fadeyi says:

    Thanks with your update. I really enjoy your in depth analysis of the Global Economics conditions, I believe all us can benefits from your advice if followed. I enjoy getting your regularly updated Newsletter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *